updated Fri. August 30, 2024
-
Law360
January 18, 2018
[2] J. Gregory Sidak and Jeremy O. Skog, Using Conjoint Analysis to Apportion Patent Damages, The Federal Circuit Bar Journal, Volume 25, No.4, June 2016: “To support their calculations of reasonable-royalty damages in patent infringement cases, experts increasingly introduce survey evidence toÃâà...
StreamingMedia.com
December 29, 2016
D-LINK, author J. Gregory Sidak explained why. (Note that FRAND stands for fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory, which is often used interchangeably with RAND). “First, the royalties from a patent pool may provide an inadequate benchmark to calculate a FRAND royalty if the pool's participants have aÃâà...
LifeZette
December 7, 2016
J. Gregory Sidak is the chairman of Criterion Economics and the editor of the Criterion Journal on Innovation. He testifies as an expert economic witness in complex business disputes throughout the Americas, Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Sidak has held several prestigious economic professorships atÃâà...
IAM (blog)
October 4, 2016
Haber points out that the authors are building on the work of others (the paper cites previous studies by Keith Mallinson and J Gregory Sidak) so they are not the first to contradict the sky-high royalty estimates made by some. Such is the nature of this debate that it will likely run for a little while yet, but thisÃâà...
ValueWalk
February 1, 2016
Attack Of The Shorting Kyle Bass: Does The IPR Process Enable Petitioners To Earn Abnormal Returns? J. Gregory Sidak & Jeremy O. Skog. Abstract. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently instituted a review process called inter partes review that provides a faster review of patent validity thanÃâà...
ValueWalk
February 1, 2016
Attack Of The Shorting Kyle Bass: Does The IPR Process Enable Petitioners To Earn Abnormal Returns? J. Gregory Sidak & Jeremy O. Skog. Abstract. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently instituted a review process called inter partes review that provides a faster review of patent validity thanÃâà...
Law360
September 1, 2015
On July 30, 2015, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the 2013 Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc. decision of Judge James Robart of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington — the first decision in which a U.S. court determined a fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory royalty for the use of aÃâà...
Law360
February 26, 2015
Litigators are familiar with the issue of potential jury bias in all of its many forms. One of those is the potential for what are known as cognitive biases, which refers to recurring (and unconscious) deviations away from a strictly logical or objective decision. Two common forms of these biases are “anchoring,”Ãâà...
Formiche.net
February 7, 2015
... alla privatizzazione del servizio a ragione dell'opposizione dell'opinione pubblica, si suggerisce The Future of the Postal Monopoly: American and European Perspectives After the Presidential Commission di Damien Geraldin di George Mason University e di J. Gregory Sidak di Criterion Economics, N. 2Ãâà...
