Schema-Root.org logo

 

  cross-referenced news and research resources about

 US Supreme Court decisions about corporations

Schema-Root.org logo
images:  google   yahoo YouTube
spacer

updated Mon. March 19, 2018

-
But Governor Pete Ricketts and Attorney General Doug Peterson are against the measure because of a legal question pending before the United States Supreme Court in a South Dakota lawsuit against online retail giant Wayfair. At issue in that case is a previous decision in Quill Corporation v.
For some odd reason our County Board has now taken displeasure with an 8-year-old Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. ... Their ballot question is should we amend the First Amendment of our United States Constitution by basically declaring that groups of associations (corporations, unions, ...
The Supreme Court's holding introduces a new legal standard and reverses a prior Osaka high court decision setting aside an arbitration award in favor of Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. and certain of its subsidiaries ("Sanyo") in a dispute with its former U.S. distributor under the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the ...
Right now, the Supreme Court is deciding the future of our economy. The most important case, of course, is Janus v. AFSCME, which will determine the future of public-sector unions. But there's another, lesser-known case that could make it easier for giant corporations to control entire industries. Ohio v.
In the 2010 Citizens United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court threw out that portion of the federal law that banned political speech by corporations. ... In the early 1960s, Virginia had a statute that made it a crime for the NAACP, a nonprofit corporation since 1911, to advertise for black people who could ...
The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments last week in a case that could devastate public-employee unions. ... The West Virginia Supreme Court upheld the orders and quoted an earlier decision: "While some constitutional protection is extended under the First Amendment to public employees to organize, ...
The White House bypassed the ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the Western US, a court with the reputation for making liberal-leaning decisions. The administration ... Instead, the Supreme Court deferred to rule on the appeal, deciding to keep DACA in place until a decision could be made. Now the appeal ...
"If we have to go to the U.S. Supreme Court to get the right answer, we will." The case was first filed in ... Federal court decisions in the last decade have freed up political spending, allowing corporations and other groups to establish so-called superPACs, which can make unlimited political expenditures.
United States: California Supreme Court Embraces Employee-Friendly Formula For Calculating OT Pay ... This decision formally breaks from the federal manner of calculating overtime which allows for dividing total compensation by total hours worked to compute ... Dart Container Corporation of California).
Federal court decisions in the last decade have freed up political spending, allowing corporations and other groups to establish so-called superPACs, which can ... "Under the law as you would have us apply it, a corporation, whether it be 126 or GE or Raytheon could essentially contribute to a PAC which is ...
When the Court issued its decision on this second case, the justices expressly declined to decide if corporations were people. The dispute could be, and ... The Supreme Court's opinions are officially published in volumes edited by an administrator called the reporter of decisions. By tradition, the reporter ...
The Supreme Court has reversed a lower court decision holding that some detained immigrants have the right to regular bond hearings. The ruling sends ... Rodriguez was written by Justice Samuel Alito and holds that some immigrants do not have a statutory right to bond hearings under US law. The Ninth ...
Recent Supreme Court decisions in the Citizens United and Hobby Lobby cases have brought the apparent triumph of corporate rights to the forefront of the national consciousness. But the nature of the role of corporations in United States history is poorly appreciated, often undermining the quality of the ...
She told Angela that the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling in 2010 grabbed her attention. ... "You had the same people that were behind the Citizens United decision that were uses test cases in the state of Montana to challenge Montana's relatively strong campaign finance laws. But then I also ...

In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court set aside historical decisions and held in Citizens United vs. the FEC that corporations were "people" and the First Amendment gave them the right to spend unlimited amounts of money to influence the outcome of elections. This opened the floodgates for money going into ...
The following year, in 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its controversial Citizens United v. F.E.C. decision, which effectively opened the way for corporations and other outside groups to make unlimited expenditures on behalf of candidates, including judges. Despite this, and shortly thereafter, ...
In an extensive ruling Friday, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Daniel Kiley concluded that Burns, as a member of the Arizona corporation Commission, has an individual right to look at the books of not only APS but Pinnacle West capital Corp., its parent company, without the backing of the majority ...
Gillibrand's announcement was endorsed by End Citizens United, a grassroots PAC aimed at amending a 2010 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that certain independent campaign expenditures by corporations, non-profits and others cannot be restricted. An End citizens United spokesperson ...
JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) -- A national group is focusing on Alaska in a bid to get the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit a 2010 decision that upended how campaigns ... The court decision paved the way for corporations and unions to make unlimited independent expenditures, and in Alaska, was viewed by state ...
Also in May 2017, William Hinman was named the new director of the SEC's Division of corporation finance. Given his experience as a partner in the silicon Valley ... 14-3599 (2d Cir. Aug. 23, 2017), which held that the Supreme Court's 2016 decision in Salman v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 420 (2016), ...
Prosecution of cases where the statute of limitations in place at the time had expired has been found unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court, Hamilton said. Nationwide, few priests have been criminally charged relative to the number of abuse claims lodged in civil litigation, she added. "Most victims ...
Couple this with the Citizens United decision by the U.S. Supreme Court (and the multitude of cases that came before it, recognizing constitutional "rights" for corporations), in which the Court guaranteed that Corporations can dump unlimited amounts of cash into races for candidates that they prefer, and it's ...
That, in a nutshell, is what the Supreme Court must decide in United States v. Microsoft. In the decision below, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit answered "yes." Not surprisingly, every other court to consider the question -- more than a dozen at last count -- has emphatically answered ...
The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to wade into a battle over Pennsylvania's Republican-friendly congressional map, clearing the way for a new map to be drawn in time for the 2018 midterm elections. The court's decision is a big win for Democrats, who hope that a fairer map will help the party ...
... of "possession, custody or control" may become more complicated in light of the U.S. Supreme Court recently granting certiorari in the landmark case of In the Matter of a Warrant to Search a Certain email Account Controlled and Maintained by Microsoft. companies will need to watch for this decision and ...
The decision rocked politics, and Mr. Obama predicted it would "open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections." In the first election after the ruling, spending did soar. Cash in congressional races leaped 46 percent and continued to tick up in ...
The Delaware Supreme Court held yesterday that the dismissal of a shareholder derivative action for lack of demand futility can preclude other derivative actions as long as the plaintiff in the dismissed case adequately represented the corporation's interests. The Court's January 25, 2018 decision in ...
Americans haven't heard much about the ongoing war in Syria lately, but there's a new front in the conflict with complicated and high stakes for the U.S. Sarah El Deeb, an Associated Press correspondent covering Syria and Lebanon, and Ambassador Frederic Hof, a former special adviser for transition in ...
DSC04303.JPG Revenue in the city's Building Services department dropped off in 2017 with the completion of the Heights high school renovation, although smaller projects are slated for Monticello and Roxboro middle schools later this year. File photo. Cleveland HEIGHTS, Ohio -- The city's year-end ...
The Supreme Court has ruled that mentally incompetent prisoners cannot be executed, but even that standard is not cut and dry. An inmate with a severe ... The same court found Madison incompetent to be executed in March 2017, and the State of Alabama appealed the decision to the US Supreme Court.
But last month, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed and remanded the Chancery Court's decision in favor of the directors in In re investors Bancorp ... When the directors submit their specific compensation decisions for approval by fully informed, uncoerced, and disinterested stockholders, ratification is ...
The documentary "RBG," a chronicle of the life and career of the United States' most pop culture-prominent Supreme Court Justice, appears to have made a ... In one clip, Ginsburg discusses the particular promise that Jews saw in the U.S.: "For Jews, the Constitution was important because the Founding ...
Over the past decade, the U.S. Supreme Court - led by Chief Justice John Roberts - increasingly has shaped the contours of complex litigation .... The ruling reversed a lower court decision that hundreds of plaintiffs who sued a corporation in California state court over alleged injuries associated with a ...
The decision in one of the country's most closely watched redistricting battles will provide a boost to Democrats seeking to retake the House of Representatives by ... The US Supreme Court could block Monday's decision, but because it involves the interpretation of the Pennsylvania state Constitution, such ...
Unfortunately, all that good work has been entirely undone by the U.S. Supreme Court in its decision in cases such as Buckley v. Valleo, Citizens United v. FEC and McCutcheon v. FEC, and by lower courts in decisions based upon them. As a result, the pace at which torrents of money, much of it "dark," i.e. ...
Unfortunately, thanks to recent case law interpretations from the U.S. Supreme Court, it would appear that neither of these important scientific advances ... related to natural phenomena also stem from recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, specifically that Court's June 2014 decision in Alice corporation v.
The brand's co-founders, Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, were even arrested during a pro-democracy demonstration outside the U.S. Capitol in 2016. ... of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, which gave corporations and unions the power to spend unlimited sums of money on political ads and ...
Oklahoma City - After losing in a decision by the Oklahoma Supreme Court, a group of Oklahomans is taking their case to the U.S. Supreme Court. A group of prominent Oklahomans ... for bribery over that vote. In September, the corporation Commission voted 2-1 to dismiss the application for a refund.
Significantly, though, the U.S. Supreme Court may not be the only high court to require the attention of global privacy mavens, as the EU's courts will ... see the CJEU's decision on the Privacy Shield for transfer data to the United States and perhaps even on the model clauses, although ultimate decisions on ...
US v. Microsoft Litigation Provides the Supreme Court with a Rare Opportunity to Further Clarify and Define the Role of Comity in International Discovery ... Thus, as long as a United States corporation has access to the information from its United States offices, disclosure is required under the SCA without ...
On the contrary, one 2009 study showed that in three major U.S. cities, "76 percent of 4,387 full-time low-wage workers in large and small companies across a variety of industries faced unpaid or underpaid overtime and 26 percent reported being paid less than minimum wage." Court decisions have ...
Indeed, a foreign sale now limits patent rights in the US. In the six months since the Supreme Court's Impression Products decision, there have been a half dozen lower court decisions that have relied on it. There are lessons to be learned from litigants who have used the decision, and the patent exhaustion ...
On May 30, 2017, the US Supreme Court issued its influential decision in Impression Products, Inc. v. ... Second, "an authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act." Id. Consequently, post-Impression Products, both restrictions and ...
Boston -- Lawmakers are weighing a bill aimed at preventing corporations from being able to claim religious exemptions from state Anti-Discrimination laws for conduct that occurs in Massachusetts. The bill is in part a reaction to the 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that enabled the Christian-owned ...
On Thursday night, the Supreme Court halted a lower court ruling that ordered North Carolina officials to revise its map of the state's Congressional Districts. The decision comes 10 days after a three-judge panel found that Republican lawmakers in the state had erred in drawing the state's congressional ...
Between 1812 and 1852, a period of 40 years, Baxter said "no lawyer had more effect on the United States Supreme Court, that wondrous engine of national power, ... Marshall, in his majority opinion, agreed with Webster that the Constitution's contract clause protected private Corporations like Dartmouth.
The study, written by multiple authors, including Mr. Ellsberg, offered a detailed history of the decision-making behind the United States' involvement in .... Every other paragraph of the Post story had to include some form of the words 'according to The New York Times,' blood -- visible only to us -- on every ...


 

news and opinion


 


 


 


 


schema-root.org

    usa
     government
      branches
       judicial branch
        supreme court
         decisions
           corporations
             allgeyer v. louisiana

US Supreme Court decisions:
           association
           corporations
           criminal
           due process
           elections
           family
           fourth amendment
           privacy
           property
           religion
           rico
           schools
           separation of powers
           speech

cross-references for
corporations: