cross-referenced news and research resources about

 US Supreme Court free speech decisions

"The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even

minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable


Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976).

"The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury."
Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976). logo
images:  google   yahoo YouTube

updated Sun. March 3, 2019

The question the U.S. Supreme Court will consider on Wednesday is whether Cilek's expressive shirt impermissibly interfered with Minnesota's interest in ... because governments eagerly embrace sinister rationalizations for “balancing” free speech against competing values, to the detriment of free speech.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in the closely watched free speech and political apparel case Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky. Arguments centered on a challenge to Minnesota's law, which broadly restricts what voters can wear to a polling place, and forbids any “political ...

U.S. Supreme Court justice Neil Gorsuch, President Trump's appointee, is expected to be the deciding vote in the pivotal union case Janus v AFSCME. ... that public sector workers contribute to a union's costs of representing them is an unconstitutional infringement of First Amendment free speech rights.
In a moment when conservative justices were inclined toward states' rights and liberal justices toward an expansive understanding of free speech, the U.S. Supreme Court held that California was entitled to adopt the rule extending free speech to private shopping malls. Although there were numerous ...
(KMSP) - The United States Supreme Court will begin debating a Minnesota law Wednesday that bans people from wearing political items at the polls. ... the Supreme Court will consider a challenge to that state law on the grounds that expressing political values should be protected by free speech.
MIAMI — A Florida man who already won an improbable victory before the U.S. Supreme Court is hoping legal lightning strikes twice in a First Amendment case pitting police powers of arrest against the right to speak freely and protest. Oral arguments are scheduled Tuesday in Fane Lozman's lawsuit ...

WASHINGTON - After a 12-year-long legal battle, the case of Riviera Beach resident Fane Lozman against the city was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday. Lozman was arrested at a city council meeting in 2006. He had only taken the podium for a few moments before then-City Council member ...
PALM BEACH COUNTY, Fla. - A dispute at a 2006 Riviera Beach city council meeting has turned into a major free-speech showdown at the U.S. Supreme Court, with implications for people across the country. The meeting plunged the city into a twelve-year legal battle. Contact 5 found the city has spent ...
Approximately 150 protesters gathered outside the Connecticut Supreme Court across from the Capitol on Monday to protest Janus v. AFSCME, a free speech case being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. Organized by the CT Working Families Party and Connecticut's government employee unions, the ...
Speaking your mind, when free speech has consequences ... role in the marketplace, the U.S. Supreme Court has set an unwavering standard.
The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously this past June, “The ... but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we ...
Princeton holds 'F%*# Free Speech' event for Constitution Day ... Referencing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Henry B. Brown in the infamous ...
... step for the businesses would be a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court. ... a city's sign ordinance violated First Amendment free speech rights ...
They say, for instance, that many businesses run on religious principles have a free speech right to violate laws that forbid discrimination ...
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said Thursday at the ... School of Law building that free speech is an “indispensible component of our ...
“It has nothing to do with free speech,” Meadows said. ... lawsuit is similar to a Colorado case headed to the U.S. Supreme Court later this year.
Brenner said the Free Speech Act aims to ensure public universities in Ohio ... ruled upon the U.S. Supreme Court in reference to free speech.

'Think like a lawyer' US Supreme Court Justice Alito says at USC law school ... Underscoring the importance that free speech, even offensive ...
He contends that hate speech should not be restricted only to those statements which pose a clear and present danger (as held in the US Supreme Court's 1919 decision in Schenck v US) or which poses an imminent threat to lawless action (held by the US ...
This kind of dark money didn't used to be a problem in Illinois political races, but as campaign laws have been rewritten, particularly after the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision, the floodgates have opened. But we can do ...
Andrew Jackson had appointed Roger Taney to the United States Supreme Court, and both men interpreted the Constitution to exclude Native Americans and persons of African ancestry from American citizenship.
A decade ago, The Times urged the Senate to confirm John Roberts to the U.S. Supreme Court even though he was a conservative judge nominated by a conservative president and was likely to pull the court to the right for decades to come.
One of the high-profile cases the U.S. Supreme Court chose to deal with in 2017 was brought by an Asian-American rock band.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled corporations and unions have free speech rights and can devote unlimited amounts to political spending.
If the U.S. Supreme Court decides not to hear Florida's appeal, then the 11th Circuit Court's ruling will be the law of the land in Florida, Alabama, and Georgia, the three states within the court's jurisdiction.
They say the law infringes on doctor's rights to free speech and interferes with the relationship between physicians and patients.
The law was debated in the courts for years before the U.S. Supreme Court decided in 1993 the law didn't violate free speech. "It doesn't punish speech," Blakeman said. "It punishes a person's conduct." A bill introduced last year by state Rep. David ...
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled multiple times that various constitutional rights give way to public school administrators' orders about safety and - their favorite word of all - appropriateness.
"The remedy is more speech, not enforced silence," wrote US Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis in 1927 in his defence of freedom of speech.
Today, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could allow companies to keep a dead hand of control over their products, even after you buy them.
There are rules regulating free speech zones, when campaigning is allowed and who is allowed to do it. Given recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings, there is even an argument to be made that the IUSA $3,000 total spending cap is a free speech limitation.
Senate hearings for Neil Gorsuch's nomination to the US Supreme Court are under way in Washington, DC, this week. If appointed, he would have a hand in interpreting the Constitution and thus shaping the nation's laws relating to primary issues ...
Sen. Robert Menendez (D-New Jersey) at a Senate Banking Committee hearing addressing the scandal relating to Wells Fargo's opening of fake bank accounts without customer knowledge, on Sept.
In free-speech jargon, they're commonly referred to as "anti-Hazelwood laws" - a reference to a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court ruling (Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier), in which the justices ruled that a Missouri high-school principal did not violate students' First ...
For example, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1993 that a cross-burning is not by itself a hate crime because of free speech guarantees. But if it is being used to threaten or intimidate someone, that can be a hate crime. Washington does have one of the ...
The U.S. Supreme Court hasn't ruled yet on whether school districts can punish students for their off-campus behavior, according to Carolyn Schurr Levin, an attorney and adviser for the Student Press Law Center.
Concern about First Amendment rights is nothing new inside the less-than-democratic halls of public high schools. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled multiple times that various constitutional rights give way to public school administrators' orders about ...
One of the landmark decisions of the United States Supreme Court, New York Times v. Sullivan, was decided in 1964 at the height ... That tension came to a head in two recent free speech incidents on university campuses. At Berkeley recently, an ...
While Simon is a well-respected judge and a recognized First Amendment expert, this specific issue appears to have never been addressed by a higher-level court such as the 9th U.S.
"Thomas Healy's lecture is particularly timely in light of the current interest in the work of the media and free speech," said Patricia Proctor, director of the Simon Perry Center for Constitutional Democracy. "It is important for us as citizens to ...
The history of such disclosure dates back to the U.S. Supreme Court's 1996 landmark ruling in Buckley v Valeo, in which the Court balanced the public's right to know who is involved in elections with an individual's right to free speech and freedom of ...
A couple years ago, when I debated Wilders on the legitimate limits of free speech in a democracy, I told him that all his proposals to restrict freedom of speech and religion for Muslims would be denounced by the U.S. Supreme Court with reference to ...
Solution allow both groups to display their posters and set up a free speech zone in the School Cafeteria or multipurpose room where they can have civil discussions and debate this or any other issue.
It could also set up Connecticut for a fight at the U.S. Supreme Court, which has previously ruled that donor privacy is part of freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.
Summum U.S. Supreme Court case that he said supports Moore's Equal Protection claim. #"(R)ecognizing permanent displays on public property as government speech will not give the government free license to communicate offensive or partisan messages.
Judge Neil Gorsuch thinks that corporations are people, entitled to broad rights of religious freedom and free speech under the First Amendment.
But it was silent on a free speech issue on which the U.S. Supreme Court has already decided unanimously. The attempt to repeal New Hampshire's buffer zone law fell well short in the House on Thursday.
In a January 1978 letter to the Tribune, months into a court battle over the group's right to march, Collin explained: "By forcing the 'free speech for National Socialism' issue in Skokie we are fighting for our basic rights everywhere." The leader of ...
Hate speech is free speech, offensive cartoons are permissible, calls to insurrection are totally legal and vile advocations of Nazism should be ignored but by no means silenced.
The decision came in response to a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning an Arizona town's ordinance about signs.


news and opinion



       judicial branch
        supreme court
             aclu v. reno
             chaplinsky v. new hampshire
             cohen v. california
             cox v. louisiana
             elrod v. burns
             fcc v. pacifica foundation
             garrison v. louisiana
             gooding v. wilson
             hustler magazine v. falwell
             lebron v. national railroad
             martin v. city of struthers
             r.a.v. v. city of st. paul
             street v. new york
             terminiello v. chicago
             united states v. grace
             widmar v. vincent,

US Supreme Court decisions:
           due process
           fourth amendment
           separation of powers