Schema-Root.org logo

 

  cross-referenced news and research resources about

 Cox V. Louisiana

Schema-Root.org logo
images:  google   yahoo YouTube
spacer

updated Fri. March 23, 2018

-
Similarly, in the 1965 case Cox v. Louisiana, the court held that the government could not prosecute protesters for demonstrating in a location where the police had said the protest was allowed. Applying Raley and Cox to the immigration context would be an extension of these precedents, but hardly ... Hail
In a 1965 case, Cox v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court overturned disorderly conduct convictions of protesters who violated a law prohibiting demonstrations "in or near" a courthouse. Although they were across the street, the protesters relied upon police officers who gave them permission to protest there.

In 1965's Cox v. Louisiana, the court drew upon Raley's reasoning in overturning the conviction of a civil rights protester. Police officials had informed the man, the Rev. Ben Elton Cox Sr., that the law permitted him to protest across the street from a courthouse. But when he held a demonstration in ... United States
Cox v. Louisiana (1965). d. Obscenity: Hard-core, highly sexually explicit pornography is not protected by the First Amendment. Miller v. California (1973). In practice, however, the government rarely prosecutes online distributors of such material. e. Child pornography: Photographs or videos involving ... Constitution
"This would be 'an indefensible sort of entrapment by the State -- convicting a citizen for exercising a privilege which the State had clearly told him was available to him,' the 7th Circuit ruled, quoting from Cox v. Louisiana, a 1965 Supreme Court ruling that expanded protest rights by forbidding "breach ...
For example, according to Cox v. Louisiana, a city may attempt to shield its judicial system from popular influence by restricting how close protesters can stand to a courthouse. Noise restrictions, too, are acceptable, according to Ward v. Rock Against Racism. Cities are also within their authority to require ... protests First Amendment

Cox v. Louisiana (1965). d. Obscenity: Hard-core, highly sexually explicit pornography is not protected by the First Amendment. Miller v. California (1973). In practice, however, the government rarely prosecutes online distributors of such material. e. Child pornography: Photographs or videos involving ...
Similarly, in the 1965 case Cox v. Louisiana, the court held that the government could not prosecute protesters for demonstrating in a location where the police had said the protest was allowed. Applying Raley and Cox to the immigration context would be an extension of these precedents, but hardly an ...
In a 1965 case, Cox v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court overturned disorderly conduct convictions of protesters who violated a law prohibiting demonstrations "in or near" a courthouse. Although they were across the street, the protesters relied upon police officers who gave them permission to protest there.
In 1965's Cox v. Louisiana, the court drew upon Raley's reasoning in overturning the conviction of a civil rights protester. Police officials had informed the man, the Rev. Ben Elton Cox Sr., that the law permitted him to protest across the street from a courthouse. But when he held a demonstration in that ...
Cox v. Louisiana (1965). d. Obscenity: Hard-core, highly sexually explicit pornography is not protected by the First Amendment. Miller v. California (1973). In practice, however, the government rarely prosecutes online distributors of such material. e. Child pornography: Photographs or videos involving actual ...
The city's lawyers cite a 1965 Supreme Court decision that sided with the leader of a civil rights demonstration who was convicted of obstructing a public passageway. In their opinion in Cox v. Louisiana, the justices made clear that although Baton Rouge had unlawfully applied that law, states do have "the ...
"This would be 'an indefensible sort of entrapment by the State — convicting a citizen for exercising a privilege which the State had clearly told him was available to him,' the 7th Circuit ruled, quoting from Cox v. Louisiana, a 1965 Supreme Court ruling that expanded protest rights by forbidding "breach of ...
For example, according to Cox v. Louisiana, a city may attempt to shield its judicial system from popular influence by restricting how close protesters can stand to a courthouse. Noise restrictions, too, are acceptable, according to Ward v. Rock Against Racism. Cities are also within their authority to require a ...

Cox v. Louisiana (1965). d. Obscenity: Hard-core, highly sexually explicit pornography is not protected by the First Amendment. Miller v. California (1973). In practice, however, the government rarely prosecutes online distributors of such material. e. Child pornography: Photographs or videos involving actual ...
Perhaps the most frequently cited of the Court's opinions affirming the right of assembly is Cox v. Louisiana, decided in 1965. That case arose from a picket organized by a group of civil-rights demonstrators four years earlier. The Rev. B. Elton Cox staged the protest in front of a Baton Rouge courthouse ...
Cox v. Louisiana (1965). d. Obscenity: Hard-core, highly sexually explicit pornography is not protected by the First Amendment. Miller v.
In their opinion in Cox v. Louisiana, the justices made clear that although Baton Rouge had unlawfully applied that law, states do have "the right ...
... available to him,' the 7th Circuit ruled, quoting from Cox v. Louisiana, a 1965 Supreme Court ruling that expanded protest rights by forbidding ...
For example, according to Cox v. Louisiana, a city may attempt to shield its judicial system from popular influence by restricting how close ...
Cox v. Louisiana (1965). d. Obscenity: Hard-core, highly sexually explicit pornography is not protected by the First Amendment. Miller v.
See also, more specifically on free speech and expression and protest on public sidewalks, Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 (1965).
Perhaps the most frequently cited of the Court's opinions affirming the right of assembly is Cox v. Louisiana, decided in 1965. That case arose ...
For example, according to Cox v. Louisiana, a city may attempt to shield its judicial system from popular influence by restricting how close protesters can stand to a courthouse.
For example, civil rights or anti-abortion protesters cannot be silenced merely because passersby respond violently to their speech.
Similarly, in the 1965 case Cox v. Louisiana, the court held that the government could not prosecute protesters for demonstrating in a location where the police had said the protest was allowed.
Hecklers do not have veto power over a speaker's right of free speech but Police must control a crowd rather than arrest the speaker in order to maintain order (Cox. v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536). Speakers have the right to be protected by law ...
... excluded the nonviolent, illegal actions of protestors from constitutional protection, and instead follow the Supreme Court's admonition, in cases like Cox v. Louisiana (1965), that crimes such as disorderly conduct, breach of the peace, and ...
Even if in reality the judge has not been influenced by excessive publicity, the appearance of prejudice may bring the judicial process into disrepute," it added, citing the U.S.


 

news and opinion


 


 


 


 


schema-root.org

    usa
     government
      branches
       judicial branch
        supreme court
         decisions
          speech
            cox v. louisiana

US Supreme Court free speech decisions:
            aclu v. reno
            chaplinsky v. new hampshire
            cohen v. california
            cox v. louisiana
            elrod v. burns
            fcc v. pacifica foundation
            garrison v. louisiana
            gooding v. wilson
            hustler magazine v. falwell
            lebron v. national railroad
            martin v. city of struthers
            r.a.v. v. city of st. paul
            street v. new york
            terminiello v. chicago
            united states v. grace
            widmar v. vincent,