Schema-Root.org logo

 

  cross-referenced news and research resources about

 US Supreme Court decisions about property

The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.
Justice Hugo Black, Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946)
Schema-Root.org logo
images:  google   yahoo YouTube
spacer

updated Mon. April 2, 2018

-
Based on preliminary information, Kilgore ISD might have to pay back $675,000 in tax revenues accrued over three years, said Revard Pfeffer, the district's chief financial officer. The district has an annual budget of $30.5 million. "It's going to hurt us a little bit," he said. "it's not going to devastate us.". school
Up on the Roof: State Supreme Court Looking at House Dispute ... (AP) -- The Michigan Supreme Court is looking at real estate in western Michigan. The court ... In August, the state appeals court reversed a local decision and said David and Helen Goyings should have been ordered to remove the home.
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in the case of Knick v. Township of Scott. In Knick, the Court is being asked to re-examine its 30-year-old doctrine requiring takings claimants to exhaust state court remedies before filing a claim for just compensation stemming from ...
On one side, property owner and Silicon Valley billionaire Vinod Khosla wants Martins Beach, a secluded crescent-shaped stretch of sand and bluffs, to himself. On the other ... Unwilling to back down, Khosla is now appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court over his right to shut out the public. His ...
Should the U.S. Supreme Court make it easier for property owners to file federal lawsuits against governments who commandeer their property? ... A federal judge threw out her takings claim based on the 1985 Supreme Court decision because she didn't pursue a state claim for compensation. Pennsylvania rights

Hunter's Lessee, a famous 1816 decision, one of the main reasons why federal courts have ultimate jurisdiction over federal constitutional issues is "the importance, and even necessity of uniformity of decisions throughout the whole United States, upon all subjects within the purview of the constitution. Rights
Beyond those cases already subject to oral arguments, the justices have been wrangling for three months over how to respond to the Trump administration's request to dissolve a lower court decision that cleared the way for pregnant Central American teenager who entered the US illegally to obtain ...
In numerous opinions dating back to the 1970s, the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that public forums, such as streets and town squares, serve an important democratic function. The court has therefore held that if government property is a public forum, regulations that burden the use of that property ...
Supreme Court justices today seemed reluctant to completely upend a decades-old rule for interpreting fractured high court decisions in a case that could have ... The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals based its decision on a 4-1-4 opinion that the Supreme Court issued in 2011 on whether defendants ...
On November 27, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal, No. 16-969. At issue is whether in inter partes reviews (“IPRs”), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) is required to issue a final written decision as to every patent claim challenged by the petitioner, ...
Recent Supreme Court decisions have expressed uneasiness with allowing the government to have unfettered access to vast amounts of digital data. ... “One thing Jones taught us — and reminded us, really — is that the property-based approach to privacy also has to be considered, not just the reasonable ...
A 15-year legal battle ended in victory for a family of western Wisconsin property owners after a law was passed undoing barriers that sent the issue to the ... Murr said the Balsam Lake Republican told her how he was developing legislation that would render the U.S. Supreme Court's decision moot.
The tax court did not reach the Trusts' challenge under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. On appeal to the Supreme Court, the following issues are presented: (1) whether there was a sufficient nexus between the Trusts and Minnesota to permit taxation of the Trusts as Minnesota ...
United States may continue a welcome recent trend: Liberal and conservative justices on the Court, by broad bipartisan margins, are insisting on translating the .... One thing Jones taught us is—and reminded us, really, is that the property-based approach to privacy also has to be considered, not just the ...
The U.S. Supreme Court won't hear requests from the town of Vernon and Upstate Citizens for Equality Inc. to review a lower court ruling upholding the ... But the Supreme Court, in a March 2005 decision, stopped the tribe from asserting sovereignty on the acquired properties without first going through the ...
Technology giants are rallying around a case heard Monday in the U.S. Supreme Court that seemingly has little to do with their companies' missions, according ... and has gained the attention of both the tech and pharmaceutical industries because of its implications for the patenting of intellectual property.

The Supreme Court twice in recent years has issued major decisions concerning how criminal law applies to new technology, both times ruling against law enforcement, including the 2014 case Roberts mentioned. In 2012, the court also decided a warrant is needed to place a GPS tracking device on a ...
United States, No. 16-402, was a potential blockbuster. “Carpenter could be the most important electronic privacy case of the 21st century,” said Jeffrey Rosen, the president of ... In a pair of recent decisions, the Supreme Court expressed discomfort with allowing unlimited government access to digital data.
While an overzealous regulatory agency may be old news to many of us, the PTAB presents a clear constitutional problem in my view. This agency endangers the court's role in reviewing patent property rights as it can essentially overrule court decisions, upholding patent rights. As we wrote in the Amicus, ...
In August, the S.C. Supreme Court handed down a set of five distinct opinions that reversed a circuit court decision, returning most church property to The Episcopal Church. Motions for ... Lewis said the disassociated diocese was now giving "serious consideration" to petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court.
The U.S. Supreme Court said local regulators could treat two lots owned by the same family as if they were a single parcel. ... Images/NewscomLawmakers in Wisconsin passed a property rights bill yesterday that effectively overturns a controversial decision made earlier this year by the U.S. Supreme Court.
... judge from the Queens Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Diocese of Brooklyn ... “Our lawyers are reviewing the decision and have advised us that, ... to convey or deliver any real property to the Diocese, and whatever the ...
Id. hiQ responded by bringing an action in U.S. District Court for the ... all other people and that LinkedIn's private property rights in controlling ... court discussed at length the California Supreme Court's decision in Robins v.
I believe the decision was wrong but equally so was the manner in which it was handled. ... The ignorance about U.S. history in general and, in this case about “Dixie ... of Confederate iconography on state property requires, at a minimum, ... 1954 United States Supreme Court's seminal decision in Brown v.
The Supreme Court has routinely held that political campaign fundraising is a ... four recent Supreme Court decisions: (1) the landmark 2010 Citizens United case, ... when a three-judge panel of the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals threw out five of ... In Goodman's mind, Zagel's decision amounted to pulling the rug out from ...
... decision in a long-standing legal battle over the prized property. ... We believe these measures should allow us to reopen the site prior to ... Last week, the district filed a request with the Illinois Supreme Court to delay the appellate order. ... Whoever owns the property is limited by a conservation easement ...
... lawyer who argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in 2015 to maintain the ... its decision, which it argues is in line with the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ... Court, ranging “from criminal to constitutional to intellectual property.
A state Supreme Court justice has ordered members of the Cayuga Nation ... The Bureau of Indian Affairs, a branch of the U.S. Department of Interior ... make a decision in this case and grant an injunction in favor of Halftown.
That battle is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, and it has drawn a host of "amicus ... Parish, 18 states, private property rights groups and San Juan County. ... Chamber of Commerce of the United States, not to mention San Juan County. ... is usurping local officials' authority to make land-use decisions.
The case turned on a seemingly simple question—what property do the Murrs own?—which was ultimately decided by the United States Supreme Court. ... the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the Wisconsin courts' decision ...
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court decision that an infringement case was not ... under Rule 11, notwithstanding the Supreme Court of the United States' guidance in Octane Fitness ( IP Update, Vol. ... More Popular Related Articles on Intellectual Property from USA.
Among the Supreme Court's many upcoming cases is Carpenter v. United States, which will settle the question of whether your location and ...
... addressing her opposition to funeral picket laws with the U.S. Supreme Court, ... helped WBC members identify a location on public property, outside the ... General Doug Peterson said in applauding the court's decision.
Nathan Connolly: "After the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. ... of racism that is invested in property rights and school boundaries, and kind ...
... to remove the statue of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Roger Taney from the State House grounds. Taney authored the Dred Scott decision in the years leading up to ... "The statue is on State property and I support Governor Hogan's decision ... Those reminders are all around us in Annapolis - as we debate ...
Pugh made the decision Tuesday morning to remove the statues that night, her ... the U.S. Supreme Court justice who wrote the Dred Scott decision denying ... monument to a private cemetery it will remain on public property.
Supreme Court Landmark Decision Declaring “The Internet Has No Borders” ... of Equustek's trade secrets and other intellectual property. ... Equustek Solutions, Inc., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, suit no. ... court in the United States as contrary to their First Amendment rights and other ...
Former Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif waves from his car after starting his journey from Rawalpindi to Lahore, Pakistan August 10, ...
Assistant Town Manager Larissa Crockett said while towns may not be able to regulate the content of temporary signs - political or otherwise - due to the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 Reed vs. Town of Gilbert (Arizona) decision, towns can manage placement ...
Supreme Court Justice nominee Neil Gorsuch, in his 2006 book, "The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia," derided the idea that a person could take their own life as a way of achieving "death with dignity.
The surface owners argued, among other things, that the County's general property tax assessment included the nonproducing mineral estate and that the failure to give notice to the mineral owners did not void the tax deed as to the mineral interest ...
The Argus Leader reports (http://argusne.ws/2mBw7p1 ) the decision stems from a lawsuit by Day County landowners and a class action against people who had been accessing two sloughs.
The U.S. Court will decide if Wisconsin lakefront front land is one parcel or two.
Before the Supreme Court's current Chief Justice John Roberts was a judge, he argued cases before the Supreme Court. According to Menlo Park resident Jeffrey L. Fisher, Justice Roberts once told a colleague that the night before every argument, he ...
Murphy remains focused on finishing the form-based code for public review. One of the projects the Urban Design Studio is working on is updating the language in the sign chapter to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the 2015 case Reed v.
Charles Taney III, a descendant of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney, offers an apology to Lynne Jackson, a descendant of Dred Scott, right, on the 160th anniversary of the Dred Scott decision on March 6, 2017, in Annapolis, Md. (Kenneth K ...
"I think I was born that way." His decisions are reversed by the Supreme Court at a higher rate than most other judges.
In 2017, constitutionally-minded policymakers in several states are positioning themselves to be leaders on this issue, remaining faithful to the Founding Fathers by protecting their citizens' property rights. Michigan, which ... property. In ...
In 1954 the U.S. Supreme Court, in Brown v. Board of Education, overturned an 1896 Supreme Court decision that had been the rule of the land for 58 years.


 

news and opinion


 


 


 


 


schema-root.org

    usa
     government
      branches
       judicial branch
        supreme court
         decisions
           property
             marsh v. alabama

US Supreme Court decisions:
           association
           corporations
           criminal
           due process
           elections
           family
           fourth amendment
           privacy
           property
           religion
           rico
           schools
           separation of powers
           speech