Schema-Root.org logo

 

  cross-referenced news and research resources about

 Meyer v. State of Nebraska

...




No emergency has arisen which renders knowledge by a child of some language other than English so clearly harmful as to justify its inhibition with the consequent infringement of rights long freely enjoyed. We are constrained to conclude that the statute as applied is arbitrary and without reasonable relation to any end within the competency of the state.



As the statute undertakes to interfere only with teaching which involves a modern language, leaving complete freedom as to other matters, there seems no adequate foundation for the suggestion that the purpose was to protect the child's health by limiting his mental activities. It is well known that proficiency in a foreign language seldom comes to one not instructed at an early age, and experience shows that this is not injurious to the health, morals or understanding of the ordinary child.


...




Schema-Root.org logo
images:  google   yahoo YouTube
spacer

updated Thu. April 11, 2019

-
Society of Sisters, Meyer v. Nebraska, and Wisconsin v. Yoder—are the law of the land in our nation. They stand firm against the incredible ...
The United State Supreme Court has recognized the rights of parents in cases like Meyer v. Nebraska, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, and ...

Lorain schools Superintendent Jeff Graham speaks at the State of the Schools Address at Lorain High School on Tuesday. BRUCE BISHOP / ...
Meyer v. Nebraska, for example, refers to "the right...to engage in any of the common occupations of life." It's not that the right no longer exists, ...
Two world wars ultimately cured them of the habit of foreign tongues, though a precedent-setting Supreme Court case, Meyer v. Nebraska in ...
The teaching of foreign languages in the United States has long been protected since the U.S. Supreme Court case of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 ...

Part I: Meyer v. Nebraska and Pierce v. .... In 1923, in Meyer v. Nebraska, the Court struck down a state law that prohibited both the use of ...
The teaching of foreign languages in the United States has long been protected since the U.S. Supreme Court case of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923), in which the court held that a 1919 Nebraska law restricting foreign-language education violated ...
Although there is no direct mention of "child" or "offspring" in the Constitution, most famously in Meyer v. Nebraska, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in 1923 that parents have the right to "establish a home and bring up children." The message is ...
Although older Supreme Court cases (Meyer v. Nebraska, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, Wisconsin v. Yoder) affirmed the fundamental right of parents to control their children's upbringing and education, that principle has been eroded - especially as it ...
Illinois, 405 U. S. 645 (1972)]; Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390- 399-401 (1923). In my home state of Connecticut, the Supreme Court has recognized that any statute implicating the fundamental right of parents must be strictly scrutinized.
Erwin Chemerinsky, a well-known legal academic, suggests the starting point for the emergence of privacy as choice is a pair of early twentieth-century cases, Meyer v. Nebraska(1923) and Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925). Both cases involved state ...
Erwin Chemerinsky, a well-known legal academic, suggests the starting point for the emergence of privacy as choice is a pair of early twentieth-century cases, Meyer v. Nebraska(1923) and Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925). Both cases involved state ...
Connecticut, 381 U.S., at 484 -485; in the Ninth Amendment, id., at 486 (Goldberg, J., concurring); or in the concept of liberty guaranteed by the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923). These ...
(This latter was affirmed in the 1923 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Meyer v. State of Nebraska.) Since the government mandates education and provides resources for fulfilling that mandate, parents should by law be permitted to honour that mandate and ...
In Meyer v. Nebraska (1923), the Supreme Court ruled that states could not unreasonably interfere with parents' liberty to raise their children in ways they see fit.
The Supreme Court has ruled on multiple occasions parents have the right to direct the education of their children, including in Meyer v. State of Nebraska (1923) and Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925). The court ruled in Meyer a state could not ...

20th Century Supreme Court rulings (Meyer v Nebraska, Roe v Wade, Griswold v Connecticut) interpret the Fourteenth Amendment to guarantee privacy from certain state intrusions.
For instance, in Meyer v. Nebraska (1923), a case involving a WWI era state ban on the teaching of German to young pupils, the Court declared that the Fourteenth Amendment's DPC protects the "the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of ...
In Meyer v. Nebraska (1923), the Supreme Court held that the liberty interest protected by the Constitution included parental rights in raising children and the "corresponding .
Connecticut, 381 U.S., at 484 -485; in the Ninth Amendment, id., at 486 (Goldberg, J., concurring); or in the concept of liberty guaranteed by the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923). These ...


resources


 

news and opinion


 


 


 


 


schema-root.org

    usa
     government
      branches
       judicial branch
        supreme court
         decisions
          schools
            meyer v. state of nebraska

US Supreme Court school decisions:
            bethel v. fraser
            brown v. board of education
            cooper v. aaron
            frederick v. morse
            goss v lopez
            hammond v. south carolina state
            hazelwood v. kuhlmeier
            ingraham v. wright
            meyer v. state of nebraska
            new jersey v. tlo
            poling v. murphy
            tinker v. des moines
            waugh v. board of trustees
            west virginia v. barnette